mirror of
https://github.com/timmypidashev/web.git
synced 2026-04-14 11:03:50 +00:00
Blog
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Blog1"
|
||||
author: "Apestein"
|
||||
publishDate: "1/29/2024"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Blog1
|
||||
74
src/web/src/app/blog/_mdx-content/ssg-renderring.mdx
Normal file
74
src/web/src/app/blog/_mdx-content/ssg-renderring.mdx
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: 'When to Use Static Generation v.s. Server-side Rendering'
|
||||
author: "Timothy Pidashev"
|
||||
date: '2020-01-02'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
We recommend using **Static Generation** (with and without data) whenever possible because your page can be built once and served by CDN, which makes it much faster than having a server render the page on every request.
|
||||
|
||||
You can use Static Generation for many types of pages, including:
|
||||
|
||||
- Marketing pages
|
||||
- Blog posts
|
||||
- E-commerce product listings
|
||||
- Help and documentation
|
||||
|
||||
```jsx
|
||||
import React, { useState } from 'react';
|
||||
|
||||
function Counter() {
|
||||
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
|
||||
|
||||
const increment = () => {
|
||||
setCount(count + 1);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const decrement = () => {
|
||||
setCount(count - 1);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
return (
|
||||
<div>
|
||||
<h1>Count: {count}</h1>
|
||||
<button onClick={increment}>Increment</button>
|
||||
<button onClick={decrement}>Decrement</button>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export default Counter;
|
||||
```
|
||||
You should ask yourself: "Can I pre-render this page **ahead** of a user's request?" If the answer is yes, then you should choose Static Generation.
|
||||
|
||||
On the other hand, Static Generation is **not** a good idea if you cannot pre-render a page ahead of a user's request. Maybe your page shows frequently updated data, and the page content changes on every request.
|
||||
|
||||
In that case, you can use **Server-Side Rendering**. It will be slower, but the pre-rendered page will always be up-to-date. Or you can skip pre-rendering and use client-side JavaScript to populate data.
|
||||
|
||||
```jsx
|
||||
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
|
||||
|
||||
const increment = () => {
|
||||
setCount(count + 1);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const decrement = () => {
|
||||
setCount(count - 1);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
return (
|
||||
<div>
|
||||
<h1>Count: {count}</h1>
|
||||
<button onClick={increment}>Increment</button>
|
||||
<button onClick={decrement}>Decrement</button>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export default Counter;
|
||||
```
|
||||
You should ask yourself: "Can I pre-render this page **ahead** of a user's request?" If the answer is yes, then you should choose Static Generation.
|
||||
|
||||
On the other hand, Static Generation is **not** a good idea if you cannot pre-render a page ahead of a user's request. Maybe your page shows frequently updated data, and the page content changes on every request.
|
||||
|
||||
In that case, you can use **Server-Side Rendering**. It will be slower, but the pre-rendered page will always be up-to-date. Or you can skip pre-rendering and use client-side JavaScript to populate data.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user